Consilience Productions

« How Partisan is the Gonzales Justice Department? | Main | Buh-buh, Gonzales »

In terrorism fight, diplomacy gets shortchanged
March 19, 2007 8:49 AM

Priorities, Priorities, Priorities...

What do you think the Bush administration's are when it comes to protecting us from the evildoers? It's all-military alll-the-time:

"Our long-term strategy to keep the peace is to help change the conditions that give rise to extremism and terror by spreading the universal principle of human liberty," Bush said in March 2005.

But a close look at the United States' counter-terrorism priorities shows a strategy going in a different direction.

In recent years, the Pentagon has received a larger share of the counter-terrorism budget, whereas "indirect action" programs to win the campaign through diplomacy and other nonmilitary means have struggled for funding and attention, according to a review of budget documents and interviews with dozens of current and former U.S. officials.

The article from the L.A. Times continues:


Nonmilitary counter-terrorism programs have budgets that are measured in millions instead of billions, and in many cases are seeing their funding remain flat or drop.

Even within the Pentagon, many "soft power" programs, which don't include direct military action, appear to be getting squeezed out as more money goes to support combat operations in Iraq and Afghanistan and special forces missions elsewhere.

Some top counter-terrorism officials, seeing their noncombat programs languishing, are leaving the government, including a top Pentagon official.

Three at the State Department who ran the highly regarded Regional Strategic Initiative are also leaving.

And increasingly, even civilian anti-terrorism operations are being run by current or former military members.

The shift has troubled many terrorism experts.

And then there's this:

The funding squeeze has meant that the State Department's Regional Strategic Initiative, a key counter-terrorism program, nearly ceased operations last year for lack of funding just as it was getting off the ground.

Its annual budget is about $1 million � roughly what the Pentagon spends on counterterrorism in Iraq every five minutes.

"The fact that they can only get $1 million is criminal. It is unconscionable," said Robert Richer, who retired as associate deputy CIA director for operations in 2005.

"Most of the war on terrorism should have nothing to do with guys with guns. But we have walked away from the hearts-and-minds campaign."

Hearts and Minds. The only thing these people in the Bush administration know how to do is to blast away. There's no long-term strategy...only a short-term "shoot-'em-up" mentality.


Join the discussion: Comments (0) | TrackBack (0) | Email Link to a Friend
Permalink to post: http://www.cslproductions.org/democracy/talk/archives/000399.shtml
Receive an email whenever this DEMOCRACY blog is updated:   Subscribe Here!
Tags: , , , , ,

Share | | Subscribe


Add your comment

Name (required)
Email
Website
Remember personal info? Yes   No
Comments

home | music | democracy | earth | money | projects | about | contact

Site design by Matthew Fries | © 2003-23 Consilience Productions. All Rights Reserved.
Consilience Productions, Inc. is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization.
All contributions are fully tax deductible.

Support the "dialogue BEYOND music!"

Because broad and informed public participation is the bedrock of a free, democratic, and civil society, your generous donation will help increase participation in the process of social change. 100% tax deductible.
Thank you!


SEARCH OUR SITE:

Co-op America Seal of Approval  Global Voices - The world is talking, are you listening?