Consilience Productions

« How to end the Great Recession. | Main | Letting the tax cuts lapse on earners over $250,000 does NOT affect small businesses. »

The true cost of the Iraq war: $3 trillion and beyond.
September 10, 2010 10:57 AM

With President Obama fulfilling a campaign promise to bring home the troops from Iraq and wind down that disastrous war, we need to ask ourselves: was it worth it? The only way to measure that question is to know the costs. We know the cost in lives -- over 4,000 American troops dead, tens-of-thousands injured and maimed for life, not to mention the 100,000 Iraqis who lost their lives since 2003. But how much has this war cost in actual dollars?

Joseph Stiglitz and Linda Bilmes outlined the monetary expenditures two years ago at the website, threetrilliondollarwar.org:

There is no such thing as a free lunch, and there is no such thing as a free war. The Iraq adventure has seriously weakened the U.S. economy, whose woes now go far beyond loose mortgage lending. You can't spend $3 trillion -- yes, $3 trillion -- on a failed war abroad and not feel the pain at home.

Some people will scoff at that number, but we've done the math. Senior Bush administration aides certainly pooh-poohed worrisome estimates in the run-up to the war. Former White House economic adviser Lawrence Lindsey reckoned that the conflict would cost $100 billion to $200 billion; Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld later called his estimate "baloney." Administration officials insisted that the costs would be more like $50 billion to $60 billion. In April 2003, Andrew S. Natsios, the thoughtful head of the U.S. Agency for International Development, said on "Nightline" that reconstructing Iraq would cost the American taxpayer just $1.7 billion. Ted Koppel, in disbelief, pressed Natsios on the question, but Natsios stuck to his guns. Others in the administration, such as Deputy Defense Secretary Paul D. Wolfowitz, hoped that U.S. partners would chip in, as they had in the 1991 Persian Gulf War, or that Iraq's oil would pay for the damages.

In 2008, we were five years into this fiasco:

As we approach the fifth anniversary of the invasion, Iraq is not only the second longest war in U.S. history (after Vietnam), it is also the second most costly -- surpassed only by World War II.

Why doesn't the public understand the staggering scale of our expenditures? In part because the administration talks only about the upfront costs, which are mostly handled by emergency appropriations. (Iraq funding is apparently still an emergency five years after the war began.) These costs, by our calculations, are now running at $12 billion a month -- $16 billion if you include Afghanistan. By the time you add in the costs hidden in the defense budget, the money we'll have to spend to help future veterans, and money to refurbish a military whose equipment and materiel have been greatly depleted, the total tab to the federal government will almost surely exceed $1.5 trillion.

But the real reason that the American public hasn't paid attention is because our government decided to borrow from future generations to pay for the war instead of asking us to pony up with higher taxes. Hello? In addition, the bloodshed was borne by our volunteer armed forces. Hardly any average American knew anyone who fought in the war, and hence, it was not "real."

Stiglitz and Bilmes wrote another article in the Washington Post just a few days ago on this topic:

As the United States ends combat in Iraq, it appears that our $3 trillion estimate (which accounted for both government expenses and the war's broader impact on the U.S. economy) was, if anything, too low. For example, the cost of diagnosing, treating and compensating disabled veterans has proved higher than we expected.

Moreover, two years on, it has become clear to us that our estimate did not capture what may have been the conflict's most sobering expenses: those in the category of "might have beens," or what economists call opportunity costs. For instance, many have wondered aloud whether, absent the Iraq invasion, we would still be stuck in Afghanistan. And this is not the only "what if" worth contemplating. We might also ask: If not for the war in Iraq, would oil prices have risen so rapidly? Would the federal debt be so high? Would the economic crisis have been so severe?

You can get all of these articles and other publications/appearances by Stiglitz and Bilmes at their website: threetrilliondollarwar.org

Join the discussion: Comments (0) | TrackBack (0) | Email Link to a Friend
Permalink to post: http://www.cslproductions.org/money/talk/archives/001069.shtml
Receive an email whenever this MONEY blog is updated:   Subscribe Here!
Tags: , , , , ,

Share | | Subscribe




Add your comment

Name (required)
Email
Website
Remember personal info? Yes   No
Comments

home | music | democracy | earth | money | projects | about | contact

Site design by Matthew Fries | © 2003-23 Consilience Productions. All Rights Reserved.
Consilience Productions, Inc. is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization.
All contributions are fully tax deductible.

Support the "dialogue BEYOND music!"

Because broad and informed public participation is the bedrock of a free, democratic, and civil society, your generous donation will help increase participation in the process of social change. 100% tax deductible.
Thank you!


SEARCH OUR SITE:

Co-op America Seal of Approval  Global Voices - The world is talking, are you listening?